| 2,099 | 21 | 229 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
RCEP签署生效为区域贸易的持续快速增长带来了巨大动力,从制度视角出发,准确剖析中国农产品出口增长的内在动力是深化区域农产品贸易合作的客观要求。本文在提出理论假设的基础上,构建三元边际分析模型,采用2002—2020年CEPII数据库的相关农产品数据,以制度距离作为解释变量,考察中国对RCEP国家农产品出口边际特征及影响因素。结果表明,中国对RCEP国家农产品出口增长主要靠扩展边际与价格边际拉动。从整体来看,制度距离对扩展边际产生显著负面影响,对数量边际产生显著正向影响;从分国家回归结果看,制度距离对于制度高质量国家出口边际无显著影响,政治制度距离显著抑制低质量制度国家农产品出口种类扩张,促进数量增长;从分类别回归结果看,政治制度距离对于植物产品出口扩展边际的抑制作用更加显著,经济制度距离对于出口边际的作用存在异质性。对此,本文提出了优化中国制度环境、建立完善的制度质量评估体系、加大对外开放力度与促进制度创新等政策建议,以期为推动中国农产品出口提供参考。
Abstract:The signing and entry into force of the RCEP agreement has brought tremendous impetus to the sustained and rapid growth of regional trade.Accurately analyzing the internal driving force of China's agricultural product exports growth from the institutional perspective is an objective requirement for deepening regional agricultural product trade cooperation.Based on the theoretical hypothesis and take institutional distance as the crucial variable, this article builds a ternary marginal analysis model and uses relevant agricultural product data from the CEPII database from 2002 to 2020 to examine the marginal characteristics and influencing factors of China's agricultural product exports to RCEP countries.The results indicate that the growth of China's agricultural product exports to RCEP countries is mainly driven by the expansion margin and price margin.As a whole, institutional distance has a significant negative impact on the expansion margin and positive impact on the quantity margin.From the perspective of country specific regression, institutional distance has no significant effect on China's export margin of high institutional quality countries, and political institutional distance significantly suppresses the expansion of agricultural product exports from low institutional quality countries and promotes quantity growth.From the perspective of categorical regression, it can be seen that political institutional distance has a more significant inhibitory effect on the expansion margin of plant product exports, while economic institutional distance has a heterogeneous effect on that.Consequently, to promote China's agricultural product exports, this article proposes several policy recommendations such as optimizing China's institutional environment, establishing a comprehensive system for evaluating institutional quality, improving the opening degree to other countries and facilitating institutional innovation.
[1]NORTH D C.Institutions,institutional change and economic performance[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1990.
[2]NUNN N,TREFLER D.Domestic institutions as a source of comparative advantage[J].National Bureau of Economic Research Working paper,2013,1885(4):263-315.
[3]LEVCHENKO A.International trade and institutional change[J].Journal of Law Economics & organization,2013,29(5):1145-1181.
[4]印永龙,佘晓玉.制度质量与农产品比较优势:基于30个国家的面板数据分析[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2015(6):109-125.
[5]王如玉,肖海峰.制度距离与中国农产品出口效率:基于“一带一路”沿线亚洲国家的实证研究[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(1):176-184.
[6]李文霞,杨逢珉.中国农产品出口丝绸之路经济带沿线国家的影响因素及贸易效率:基于随机前沿引力模型的分析[J].国际贸易问题,2019,439(7):100-112.
[7]李峥,刘锭,霍增辉,等.中国与RCEP成员国茶叶贸易竞争性与互补性分析[J].茶叶科学,2022,42(5):740-752.
[8]冯宗宪,李诚.RCEP背景下中国农产品出口竞争优势及动因分析[J].西安交通大学学报(社会科学版),2022,42(2):53-64.
[9]石超.中国与RCEP伙伴国贸易效率及其发展潜力研究[J].价格理论与实践,2022,461(11):181-184,211.
[10]李加林,江慧,陈秋华.中国与RCEP成员国木质林产品双边贸易实证研究[J].亚太经济,2022,235(6):114-122.
[11]陈雨生,王艳梅.中国与RCEP成员国农产品贸易结构、效率及影响因素研究:基于细分产品的实证分析[J].世界农业,2021,512(12):72-83,106,128.
[12]KRUGMAN P R.Increasing returns,monopolistic competition,and international trade [J].Journal of International Economics,1979(9):469-479.
[13]MELIZ M.The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocation and aggregate industry productivity[J].Econometrica,2003,71(6):1695-1795.
[14]HUMMELS D,KLENOW P J.The variety and quality of a nation’s exports[J].American Economic Review,2005,95(3):704-723.
[15]施炳展.中国外贸顺差的可持续性研究:基于价格、数量与广度的三元分解[J].经济评论,2010,163(3):67-75.
[16]房悦,李先德.中国从中亚进口农产品的贸易边际及其影响因素研究[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,163(1):71-81.
[17]金珏雯,穆月英.中国谷物进口来源和结构的决定因素研究:基于三元边际的实证[J].世界农业,2022(9):28-39.
[18]李向阳,孙东升,刘合光.基于三元边际分析的中国柑橘出口增长研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2021,42(9):110-118.
[19]LEVCHENKO A.Institutional quality and international trade[J].The Review of Economic Studys,2007,74(3):791-819.
[20]黄先海,吴屹帆.正式制度、非正式制度质量与比较优势[J].国际贸易问题,2020(3):1-21.
[21]KOSTOVA T.Success of the transnational transfer of organizational practices within multinational companies[D].Minneapolis:University of Minnesota,1996.
[22]TINBERGEN J.Shaping the world economy:suggestions for an international economic policy[D].New York:The Twentieth Century Fund,1962.
[23]年卓玉,杨习铭.制度距离对中国与西亚国家出口贸易效率的影响研究[J].统计理论与实践,2023,527(3):23-30.
[24]张亦驰,田明华.制度距离对中国纸和纸板出口贸易效率和潜力的影响[J].林业经济问题,2021,41(4):405-413.
[25]KOGUT B,SINGH H.The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode[J].Journal of International Business Studies,1988,411-432.
[26]姚辉斌,彭新宇.“一带一路”沿线国家制度环境对中国农产品出口贸易的影响研究[J].农业技术经济,2021(4):17-29.
[27]颜小挺,祁春节.中国对东盟生鲜农产品出口三元边际及影响因素研究:以水果出口为例[J].统计与信息论坛,2016,31(4):67-73.
[28]许德友,梁琦,张文武.中国对外贸易成本的测度方法与决定因素:一个基于面板数据的衡量[J].世界经济文汇,2010(6):1-13.
[29]BRICONGNE J C,DELPEUCH S,FORERO M L.Productivity slowdown and tax havens:where is measured value creation?[J].Journal of International Economics,2023,143:103757.
[30]王晓宇.“一带一路”背景下制度距离对中国向中东和北非出口贸易影响研究[J].国际商务研究,2020,41(1):17-28.
[31]方国柱,雷权勇,祁春节.制度质量是否促进了高附加值农产品出口?全球柑橘贸易的证据[J].华中农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023(5):77-89.
[32]余永庆,杨小云.“一带一路”沿线国家经济距离对中国农产品贸易成本的影响[J].商业经济研究,2022(18):143-146.
[33]王瑞,钟冰平.制度质量对中国农产品出口贸易的影响及中国对策:基于丝绸之路经济带沿线国家经验数据[J].浙江学刊,2019(2):114-122.
[34]刘雪梅,董银果.数量、质量抑或性价比:中国农产品出口增长动力来源与转换研究[J].国际贸易问题,2019(11):100-115.
[35]喻美辞,蔡宏波.自由贸易协定能缓解中国出口农产品质量升级困境吗[J].国际贸易问题,2022(8):136-155.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2024.03.003
中图分类号:F752.7;F742;F323
引用信息:
[1]刘锭,陈富桥,霍增辉.制度距离影响中国对RCEP国家农产品出口贸易边际吗?[J].世界农业,2024,No.539(03):29-42.DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2024.03.003.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目“需要满足视角下农户相对贫困测度与防贫机制研究”(19BGL225)
2024-03-10
2024-03-10