nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2023, 02, No.526 38-47
中美农产品贸易关系分析与展望
基金项目(Foundation): 财政部、农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系专项资金(CARS-08); 中国农业科学院基本科研业务费专项“RCEP国际经贸新规则对我国农业的影响及对策研究”(1610052022023、Y2021ZK01),中国农业科学院创新工程“国际农业经济与贸易”(10-IAED-04-2022); 中国工程院咨询项目“工程科技支撑‘一带一路’建设战略研究”(2017-ZD-15)
邮箱(Email): zhanghuijie@caas.cn;
DOI: 10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2023.02.003
发布时间: 2023-02-10
出版时间: 2023-02-10
移动端阅读
摘要:

中国和美国是全球农业贸易网络中的关键主体,也是相互影响的重要贸易伙伴。本文对2018—2021年美国政策变化影响中美农产品贸易关系的路径进行分析,结合拜登政策主张展望拜登政府时期的中美农产品贸易关系走势。结合定性与定量方法,本文发现特朗普政府时期中美农产品贸易摩擦对美国弊大于利,直到中美第一阶段经贸协议在一定程度上修复了中美农产品贸易关系。美国极端单边主义随特朗普政府时期结束而暂停,拜登政府亟须恢复并提高美国农业的国际竞争力和国际话语权,新政府的农业对策在劳动力、科研、资金以及环境保护方面给予更多关注,意在加强美国农业的可持续发展能力,期望继续开拓美国农产品在中国的市场,中美农产品贸易未来亦存在冲突可能——为保障美国农业利益,拜登政府可能推动美国农产品出口的多元化,并通过自由贸易协议、非关税壁垒等措施向中国农产品的正常贸易施压。本文相应提出高水平扩大农业对外开放,进一步优化国际供应链和产业链,更好融入WTO多边框架机制,加大推进“一带一路”农产品贸易合作等相关政策建议。

Abstract:

China and the United States are key players in the global agricultural trade network and important trading partners that influence each other.This paper analyzes the impact paths of US policy changes on China-US agricultural trade relations between 2018 and 2021 and looks at the trend of China-US agricultural trade relations during the Biden administration in the context of Biden's policy ideas.Combining qualitative and quantitative methods, this paper finds that the China-US agricultural trade friction under the Trump administration has “done more harm than good”to the US until the first phase of the China-US agreement repaired the China-US agricultural trade relations to a certain extent.The extreme “unilateralism” of the US was suspended with the end of the Trump era, and the Biden administration urgently needs to restore and improve the international competitiveness and international discourse of US agriculture, and the new administration's agricultural countermeasures pay more attention to labor, research, capital, and environmental protection, to strengthen the sustainability of US agriculture and expect to continue to develop.To protect US agricultural interests, the Biden administration will probably promote the diversification of US agricultural exports and put pressure on China's normal agricultural trade through free trade agreements, non-tariff barriers, and other measures.Accordingly, this paper puts forward relevant policy suggestions, such as expanding the opening up of agriculture to the outside world at a high level, further optimizing the international supply chain and industrial chain, better integrating into the multilateral framework mechanism of WTO,and promoting the “Belt and Road” agricultural trade cooperation.

参考文献

[1]PRAZERES T,林桂军,任靓.美国对华遏制和贸易秩序再平衡:对2019年WTO的回顾[J].国际贸易问题,2020(6):1-18.

[2]倪峰.中美关系40年及其经验[J].国际论坛,2019,21(2):3-9,155.

[3]钟钰.中美经贸协议下双边农产品贸易演化与前景[J].中州学刊,2022(3):21-28.

[4]孙东升,苏静萱,李宁辉,等.中美贸易摩擦对中美农产品贸易结构的影响研究[J].农业经济问题,2021(1):95-106.

[5]ROSYADI S,WIDODO T.Impact of Donald Trump’s tariff increase against Chinese imports on the global economy:Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model[J].Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies,2018,16:1-21

[6]周曙东,郑建,卢祥.中美贸易争端对中国主要农业产业部门的影响[J].南京农业大学学报(社会科学版),2019,19(1):130-141,167-168.

[7]ZHENG Y Q,WOOD D,WANG H,et al.Predicting potential impacts of China’s retaliatory tariffs on the U.S.farm sector[J].Choices,2018,33(2):1-6.

[8]王月,程景民.贸易摩擦、中国农产品市场引力效应与伙伴国贸易前景:基于随机模型及15国数据的实证研究[J].农业经济问题,2020(5):131-142.

[9]韩一军,纪承名.中美贸易争端对中国农业的影响[J].农业展望,2018,14(10):85-88.

[10]朱晶,李天祥,臧星月.高水平开放下我国粮食安全的非传统挑战及政策转型[J].农业经济问题,2021(1):27-40.

[11]倪峰.2019年中美关系回顾[J].现代国际关系,2020(1):11-13.

[12]陈博欧,张锦华.中美农产品贸易特征的统计考察[J].统计与决策,2021,37(2):108-111.

[13]李明,潘子纯,李崇光.虚拟水进口视角下中美农产品贸易效益分析[J].世界农业,2022(5):48-59.

[14]程恩富,罗玉辉.40年中美农产品贸易:回顾与展望:写在中美经贸第一阶段协议签署后[J].经济纵横,2021(3):27-38.

[15]FEENSTRA R C,HONG C.China’s import demand for agricultural products:the impact of the phase one trade agreement:27383[R].Cambridge:National Bureau of Economic Research,2020.

[16]张玉梅,盛芳芳,陈志钢,等.中美经贸协议对世界大豆产业的潜在影响分析:基于双边贸易模块的全球农产品局部均衡模型[J].农业技术经济,2021(4):4-16.

[17]王容博,曹历娟,朱晶.中美经贸摩擦中的农产品进口与中国粮食安全[J].国际贸易问题,2022(5):122-136.

[18]唐宜红,符大海.经济全球化变局、经贸规则重构与中国对策:“全球贸易治理与中国角色”圆桌论坛综述[J].经济研究,2017,52(5):203-206.

[19]张玉环.特朗普政府的对外经贸政策与中美经贸博弈[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2018,35(3):12-36.

[20]白卫东.美国总统个性与对华决策研究[D].延安:延安大学,2020.

[21]尹继武.特朗普的个性特质对美国对华政策的影响分析[J].当代美国评论,2018,2(2):52-74,123-124.

[22]邹鑫.特朗普政府与奥巴马政府外交理念与决策的比较研究[D].青岛:青岛大学,2020.

[23]赵明昊.拜登执政与美国对华战略竞争走向[J].和平与发展,2021(3):14-36,135-136.

[24]赵明昊.重新找回“西方”:拜登政府的外交政策构想初探[J].美国研究,2020,34(6):45-64.

[25]倪峰,傅梦孜,唐永胜,等.拜登时期中美关系前瞻[J].国际经济评论,2021(1):102-115.

[26]陈佳.拜登时代的中美关系:趋势与应对[J].思想政治课教学,2021(5):54-58.

[27]金灿荣,刘丹阳.拜登胜选后的中美关系走向[J].前线,2021(1):40-43.

[28]宋静,司乐如.美国智库因素影响下的拜登政府对华政策走向[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2021(1):56-79.

[29]李宏洲,尹继武.拜登的人格特质及决策特点[J].现代国际关系,2021(2):11-22,65.

[30]刘国柱.拜登政府国家安全战略的基本方针与发展方向[J].当代世界,2021(5):50-57.

[31]朱锋,丁纯,杨成,等.拜登政府执政后的重大国际问题笔谈[J].国际展望,2021,13(2):1-26,153.

[32]DNC.Joe Biden’s plan for rural America [EB/OL].[2022-06-14].https://joebiden.com/rural-plan/.

[33]Des Moines Register.Joe Biden spells out a winning plan for agriculture and rural America[EB/OL].(2020-09-07)[2022-06-14].https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/opinion/columnists/2020/09/07/joe-biden-spells-out-winning-plan-agriculture-and-rural-america/5685849002/.

[34]RFD TV.What President Biden’s executive orders mean for rural America,agriculture[EB/OL].[2022-06-14].https://www.rfdtv.com/story/43211836/what-president-bidens-executive-orders-mean-for-rural-america-agriculture.

[35]National Law Review.Biden climate policy focusing on agriculture[EB/OL].[2022-06-14].https://www.natlawreview.com/article/agriculture-focus-under-biden-climate-policy.

[36]Green Fiscal Policy Network.Under Trump administration,farm subsidies soared and the rich got richer[EB/OL].(2021-09-08)[2022-06-14].https://greenfiscalpolicy.org/under-trump-farm-subsidies-soared-and-the-rich-got-richer/.

[37]Food and Environment Reporting Network.Biden vows to pay farmers to plant cover crops and put land in conservation[EB/OL].[2022-06-14].https://thefern.org/ag_insider/biden-vows-to-pay-farmers-to-plant-cover-crops-and-put-land-in-conservation/.

[38]Financial Post.Biden agriculture pick boosts farmer hopes on biofuel,trade[EB/OL].[2022-06-14].https://financialpost.com/pmn/business-pmn/biden-agriculture-pick-boosts-farmer-optimism-on-biofuels-trade.

[39]Farm Progress.Trump and Biden:what solutions do they bring to ag?[EB/OL].(2020-09-10)[2022-06-14].https://www.farmprogress.com/farm-policy/trump-and-biden-what-solutions-do-they-bring-ag.

[40]余振,王净宇.拜登政府对华贸易政策评估与展望[J].当代美国评论,2021,5(4):20-36,126.

[41]阮建平,邓凯帆,王佳敏.拜登政府对华战略竞争与危机管控[J].国际展望,2022,14(4):62-79,155.

[42]李金锴,陈珏颖,刘合光.中美农产品贸易的比较优势分析[J].中国农业科技导报,2019,21(11):1-8.

[43]PBS News Hour.3 reasons farmers hurt by the U.S.-China trade war still support Trump[EB/OL].(2019-11-05)[2022-08-03].https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/3-reasons-farmers-hurt-by-the-u-s-china-trade-war-still-support-trump.

[44]余振,王净宇.美国对华经贸的“脱钩”与“再挂钩”:思想渊源与现实逻辑[J].国际展望,2022,14(3):97-114,160-161.

[45]Successful Farming.Agriculture has ‘unfinished business’ in Sino-U.S.trade,says Vilsack[EB/OL].(2022-01-21)[2022-08-04].https://www.agriculture.com/news/business/agriculture-has-unfinished-business-in-sino-us-trade-says-vilsack.

[46]Ohio Ag Net.Biden’s agenda and agriculture[EB/OL].[2022-06-14].https://ocj.com/2020/11/bidens-agenda-and-agriculture/.

[47]SFS.US trade policy in the Biden administration:the challenge of China’s rise[EB/OL].(2020-12-21)[2022-06-14].https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2020/12/21/us-trade-policy-in-the-biden-administration-the-challenge-of-chinas-rise/.

[48]LESTER S,ZHU H.Adjudication vs.“Frontier Justice” in international economic law disputes:the Trump administration’s push for unilateralism in trade enforcement:3537576[R].Rochester,NY:Social Science Research Network,2020.

[49]Ukr Agro Consult.US farmers need to diversify away from China[EB/OL].(2021-07-15)[2022-08-04].https://ukragroconsult.com/en/news/us-farmers-need-to-diversify-away-from-china/.

[50]USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.Vietnam lowers tariffs on corn,wheat,pork[EB/OL].[2022-06-14].https://www.fas.usda.gov/newsroom/vietnam-lowers-mfn-tariffs-corn-wheat-pork.

[51]余振,王净宇.拜登会改变特朗普的贸易政策吗:基于产业地理视角的分析[J].美国研究,2021,35(3):28-45.

[52]屠新泉,石晓婧.国家主权与国际规则:美国对世界贸易组织争端解决机制的态度变迁[J].太平洋学报,2020,28(6):1-11.

基本信息:

DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2023.02.003

中图分类号:F323.7;F752.7;F757.12

引用信息:

[1]刘婷婷,麻吉亮,张蕙杰,等.中美农产品贸易关系分析与展望[J].世界农业,2023,No.526(02):38-47.DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2023.02.003.

基金信息:

财政部、农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系专项资金(CARS-08); 中国农业科学院基本科研业务费专项“RCEP国际经贸新规则对我国农业的影响及对策研究”(1610052022023、Y2021ZK01),中国农业科学院创新工程“国际农业经济与贸易”(10-IAED-04-2022); 中国工程院咨询项目“工程科技支撑‘一带一路’建设战略研究”(2017-ZD-15)

发布时间:

2023-02-10

出版时间:

2023-02-10

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文