| 482 | 2 | 211 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
引导和激励返乡农民工参与农村公共品供给对于推进乡村建设具有重要意义,也有助于解决农村公共品供给中“最后一公里”难题。本文分别从邻里关系、亲族关系两个维度,基于2016年与2018年两期中国劳动力动态调查数据(CLDS),实证检验了关系网络对返乡农民工农村公共品供给意愿的影响。研究结果表明:第一,关系网络显著促进返乡农民工参与农村公共品供给意愿,即关系网络更融洽的返乡农民工参与农村公共品供给意愿更强;第二,关系网络可通过强化乡土情结促进农民工返乡的生活适应性与生产依赖性,进而提升其公共品供给意愿;第三,长期返乡、村容村貌美观、位于东部地区的返乡农民工,其关系网络对供给意愿的促进作用更明显,通过分组回归识别出有效吸引返乡农民工积极参与乡村建设的边界条件,为进一步依据村庄布局与地理位置的关系网络特征制定与此相适应的农村公共品供给政策提供了参考。因此,在大力实施乡村振兴背景下,提出要重视关系网络对于返乡农民工参与农村公共品供给的积极影响,建设和美乡村,缩小城乡间建设差距。
Abstract:Encouraging returning rural migrant workers to participate in rural public goods supply is crucial for promoting rural development and addressing the “last-mile” problem in delivering such services. This paper examines the willingness of returning rural migrant workers to provide rural public goods by empirically testing the influence of relationship networks, focusing on the aspects of neighborhood and kinship. The analysis is based on data gathered from the China Labor Dynamics Survey(CLDS) in 2016 and 2018.The results of the study show that: Firstly, relationship networks significantly can promote the willingness of returning rural migrant workers to participate in rural public goods supply, i.e., returning rural migrant workers with a more cordial relationship network have a stronger willingness to participate in rural public goods supply. Secondly, relationship networks can enhance the willingness to participate in rural public goods supply by strengthening the local sentiment and promoting the adaptability of life and production dependence of returning rural migrant workers. Thirdly, the heterogeneity analysis revealed that relationship networks of returning migrant workers, particularly those who have returned to their hometowns for a long time, live in aesthetically pleasing villages, and are situated in the eastern region, significantly enhances their willingness to contribute to rural public goods supply. Through regression analysis, we identified boundary conditions that effectively encourage these workers to engage actively in rural construction. These findings will inform the development of rural public goods supply policies tailored to the characteristics of the relationship networks, village layouts, and geographic locations. In light of these results, it is essential to recognize the positive impact of relationship networks on the participation of returning rural migrant workers in rural revitalization efforts. Building a harmonious and beautiful village, and while narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas are essential goals in this process.
[1]孔祥智,涂圣伟.新农村建设中农户对公共物品的需求偏好及影响因素研究:以农田水利设施为例[J].农业经济问题,2006,27(10):10-16,79.
[2]董筱丹,温铁军.宏观经济波动与农村“治理危机”:关于改革以来“三农”与“三治”问题相关性的实证分析[J].管理世界,2008,24(9):67-75,89.
[3]梁志会,张露,张俊飚.包容性制度能改善农村公共治理吗?:基于农业税改革与村庄农田水利投入关系的经验分析[J].管理世界,2022,38(9):113-127.
[4]GRANOVETTER M S.The strength of weak ties[J].American Journal of Sociology,1973,78(6):1360-1380.
[5]李佩,罗必良.劳动力转移如何影响农村熟人社会变迁?[J].农村经济,2022,40(6):1-9.
[6]李洪涛,刘馨.人口流动视域下地方政府债务扩张与区域经济发展[J].中央财经大学学报,2023,43(7):3-14,28.
[7]魏东霞,陆铭.早进城的回报:农村移民的城市经历和就业表现[J].经济研究,2021,56(12):168-186.
[8]黎红梅,文杰.群体认同、关系网络与农田灌溉系统治理:基于农户间行为协同的视角[J].农村经济,2022,40(1):108-117.
[9]蔡起华,朱玉春.社会信任、关系网络与农户参与农村公共产品供给[J].中国农村经济,2015,31(7):57-69.
[10]BOURDIEU P.“The forms of capital”The sociology of economic life.[M].London:Routledge,2018.
[11]COLEMAN J S.Foundations of social theory[M].Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1994.
[12]PUTNAM R D,LEONARDI R,NANETTI R Y.Making democracy work:civic traditions in modern Italy[M].Princeton university press,1993.
[13]黄华,姚顺波.生态认知、政府补贴与农户参与农村人居环境整治意愿[J].统计与信息论坛,2021,36(12):80-91.
[14]李青,郭梓焱,刘春湘.规则下乡何以促进村庄自主性:基于浙东张村的田野调查[J].湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2024,48(1):73-80.
[15]尹建华,石少卿.“强关系”还是“弱关系”:社会互动对中国城市家庭节能行为的影响路径分析[J].中国地质大学学报(社会科学版),2020,20(4):90-102.
[16]黄美娇,李中斌,苏小凤.创业能力、创业坚持与农民工返乡创业幸福感:乡土情结的调节作用[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版),2023,45(2):138-148.
[17]刘金发.“返”其道而行:“乡愁”建构与农民工返乡创业:基于S省Y县的扎根理论研究[J].济南大学学报(社会科学版),2022,32(5):120-130.
[18]严红.熟人社会、面子与村庄公共性再生产[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,22(4):118-129.
[19]何微微,胡小平.认同、归属与发展:新生代农民工留城意愿的影响研究:基于重庆市的调研数据[J].农村经济,2017,35(8):122-127.
[20]GRANOVETTER M S.Economic action and social structure:a theory of embeddedness[J].American Journal of Sociology,1985,91(3):481-510.
[21]边燕杰,张文宏.经济体制、社会网络与职业流动[J].中国社会科学,2001,22(2):77-89,206.
[22]边燕杰,缪晓雷.如何解释“关系”作用的上升趋势?[J].社会学评论,2020,8(1):3-19.
[23]邓睿,冉光和,肖云,等.生活适应状况、公平感知程度与农民工的城市社区融入预期[J].农业经济问题,2016,37(4):58-69,111-112.
[24]王通.中国流动人口市民化的场域适应与行为变迁[J].华南农业大学学报(社会科学版),2023,22(6):115-125.
[25]张梁梁,李世强.外出务工经历、邻里关系与返乡农民工创业[J].人口与经济,2022,43(2):140-154.
[26]李雪峰,高远卓,卢海阳.外出务工经历对返乡农民工参与农村公共事务治理的影响[J].中国农村观察,2023(4):70-88.
[27]李荣彬.农村居民公共事务参与的治理之道:来自宗族网络的证据与解释[J].经济社会体制比较,2021,37(5):129-138.
[28]江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120.
[29]庄晋财,陈聪.乡土情结对农民创业者供给村庄公共品的影响研究[J].西安财经大学学报,2018,31(2):78-86.
[30]杨明婉,张乐柱,张苇锟.社会资本、交易费用与农户正规借贷行为[J].世界农业,2020,42(8):30-38.
[31]张仁慧,朱玲,赵凯.邻里效应对农户粮食生产托管的影响:基于河南省周口市617户小麦种植户的经验证据[J].经济与管理研究,2023,44(5):75-92.
[32]李艳,陈卫平.线上社会网络对农村网商经营绩效的影响:机制与证据[J].中国农村经济,2023,39(9):165-184.
基本信息:
DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2024.09.007
中图分类号:F323.6;F320;C912.3
引用信息:
[1]常伟,杨嘉鑫.君自故乡来:关系网络促进农民工参与农村公共品供给了吗[J].世界农业,2024,No.545(09):80-91.DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2024.09.007.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金项目“政府主导型农地大规模流转问题研究”(12CJY052); 兵团社会科学基金项目“新疆兵团农地经营模式创新研究”(23YB05); 石河子大学高层次人才科研启动项目“新疆地区农地大规模流转问题研究”(RCSK202002)
2024-09-05
2024-09-05