nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 11, No.547 5-18
大变局下中美农产品期货市场间溢出效应研究——基于频域和分位数溢出的视角
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金面上项目“重大突发事件冲击下我国粮食全球供应链风险防范研究”(24BGL174); 全国统计科学研究重点项目“国际粮食供应链安全风险测度与防范研究”(2022LZ02); 山东省重点研发计划(软科学)重大项目“山东省粮食产业链供应链韧性和安全水平提升研究”(2023RZA02014)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2024.11.001
摘要:

深入探究大变局下中美农产品期货市场间溢出效应,不仅有助于理解中美农产品期货市场间的关系,而且对于农产品期货市场的风险监测及防控具有重要的参考价值。本文采用新发展的基于TVP-VAR模型的时变频域溢出指数方法和基于QVAR模型的分位数溢出指数方法,多维度分析中美农产品期货市场间溢出效应,并对其传导机制进行了分析。结果表明:中美农产品期货市场间存在显著的溢出效应,平均溢出水平为21.25%,主要由短期溢出效应主导,短期溢出水平是长期溢出水平的3.4倍,且中美农产品期货市场间溢出效应在极端事件冲击下更大,极端状态下溢出水平是正常状态下溢出水平的4倍;中美农产品期货市场间溢出效应具有非对称性,美国农产品期货市场对中国农产品期货市场的溢出水平是中国农产品期货市场对美国农产品期货市场溢出水平的2倍;中国农产品期货受到美国农产品期货的溢出水平均高于受到国内其他品种期货的溢出水平,其中,市场调控较小、对外依赖程度较高的食糖、豆粕、棉花等农产品期货与美国农产品期货市场联动性较强;在市场基本面机制和市场传染机制共同作用下,中美农产品期货市场间溢出效应主要受到国际农产品库存、金融危机、中美贸易摩擦、俄乌冲突等因素影响。

Abstract:

Deeply exploring the spillover effect between China and US agricultural futures markets under the great changes are not only helpful to understand the relationship between China and the United States agricultural futures markets, but also have important implications for the risk monitoring and prevention and control of agricultural futures markets.This paper use time-varying frequency spillover index method based on TVP-VAR model and quantile spillover index method based on QVAR model to analyze the spillover effect between China and US agricultural futures markets in multiple dimensions, and analyze its transmission mechanism.The results show that the spillover effect between the agricultural futures markets of China and the United States is significant, with an average spillover level of 21.25%.Mainly dominated by short-term spillover effects, the level of short-term spillover is 3.4 times that of long-term spillover.And the spillover effect between the agricultural futures markets of China and the United States is greater under extreme event shocks, with the spillover level in extreme states being 4 times higher than that in normal states.The spillover effect between the agricultural futures markets of China and the United States is asymmetric.The spillover level of the US agricultural futures market to the Chinese agricultural futures market is twice that of the Chinese agricultural futures market to the US agricultural futures market.The spillover of Chinese agricultural futures from American agricultural futures is higher than that from other domestic futures.Among them, sugar, soybean meal, cotton and other futures with less market regulation and higher dependence on foreign markets have strong linkage with the American futures market.Under the joint action of market fundamentals mechanism and market contagion mechanism, the spillover effect between China and the United States agricultural futures markets is mainly affected by international agricultural inventory, financial crisis, Sino US trade friction, Russia Ukraine conflict and other factors.

参考文献

[1]郭晨光,熊学萍.充分发挥期货市场对农业农村现代化的服务功能[J].农业经济问题,2021(3):75-87.

[2]许祥云,何恋恋,高灵利.农产品政策如何影响国际市场对国内期货市场的价格传递效应:以棉花和豆类产品的收储及补贴政策为例[J].世界经济研究,2016(6):55-68,135.

[3]华仁海,陈百助.国内、国际期货市场期货价格之间的关联研究[J].经济学(季刊),2004(2):727-742.

[4]李剑,吕捷,李崇光.农产品期货市场泡沫风险实时预警研究[J].中国农村经济,2019,411(3):53-64.

[5]叶五一,李艾琳,焦守坤.基于动态模型平均的大豆期货市场风险溢出研究[J].中国管理科学,2023,31(12):1-10.

[6]方先明,高元.地缘冲突风险、大宗商品金融化与农产品期货价格波动[J].经济问题,2023(6):57-67.

[7]朱信凯,吕捷,黄娟.中美豆类产品国际贸易中的期货与现货市场价格关系分析[J].农业技术经济,2010(2):4-14.

[8]秦静,乔虹.中美粮食期货市场极端风险的幂律溢出效应研究[J].世界农业,2022(9):53-64.

[9]HE L Y ,CHEN S P.Multifractal detrended cross-correlation analysis of agricultural futures markets[J].Chaos,Solitons & Fractals,2011,44(6):355-361.

[10]华仁海,刘庆富.国内外期货市场之间的波动溢出效应研究[J].世界经济,2007(6):64-74.

[11]周应恒,邹林刚.中国大豆期货市场与国际大豆期货市场价格关系研究:基于VAR模型的实证分析[J].农业技术经济,2007(1):55-62.

[12]柳苏芸,韩一军,包利民.价格支持政策改革背景下国内外大豆市场动态关联分析:基于贝叶斯DCC-GARCH模型[J].农业技术经济,2016(8):72-84.

[13]周大朋,穆月英.美国贸易政策不确定性对中美玉米期货市场波动的影响[J].世界农业,2022(10):28-38.

[14]JI Q,ZHANG X,ZHU Y.Multifractal analysis of the impact of US–China trade friction on US and China soy futures markets[J].Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2020,542:123222.

[15]丁存振,徐宣国.粮价波动跨国溢出、网络结构及其影响因素研究[J].现代经济探讨,2022(9):72-84.

[16]BENOIT S,COLLIARD J E,HURLIN C,et al.Where the risks lie:a survey on systemic risk[J].Review of Finance,2017,21 (1):109-152.

[17]GOYENKO R Y,UKHOV A D.Stock and bond market liquidity:a long-run empirical analysis[J].Journal of Financial & Quantitative Analysis,2009,44(1):189-212.

[18]徐晓光,廖文欣,郑尊信.沪港通背景下行业间波动溢出效应及形成机理[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2017,34(3):112-127.

[19]杨翰方,王祎帆,王有鑫.中国输入性金融风险:测算、影响因素与来源[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2020,37(7):113-133.

[20]张兵,范致镇,李心丹.中美股票市场的联动性研究[J].经济研究,2010,45(11):141-151.

[21]GARBADE K,SILBER W L.Price movement and price discovery in futures and cash markets[J].The Review of Economics and Statistics,1983,65(10),289-297.

[22]肖小勇,李崇光,黄静.农产品期货价格波动关联:基于日频数据和关联测量新框架[J].农业技术经济,2019(1):25-39.

[23]郑燕,丁存振.国际农产品价格对国内农产品价格动态传递效应研究[J].国际贸易问题,2019(8):47-64.

[24]丁存振,肖海峰.国内和国际棉花期现货市场溢出效应与动态关联研究:基于不同政策背景下的比较分析[J].中南大学学报(社会科学版),2018,24(5):117-128.

[25]JIA R L,WANG D H,Tu J Q,et al.Correlation between agricultural markets in dynamic perspective:evidence from China and the US futures markets[J].Physica A Statistical Mechanics & Its Applications,2016,464(12):83-92.

[26]DIEBOLD F X,YILMAZ K.On the network topology of variance decompositions:measuring the connectedness of financial firms[J].Journal of Econometrics,2014,182(1):119-134.

[27]丁存振,徐宣国.基于社会网络视角的我国粮食市场风险空间溢出研究:基于玉米市场的风险测度与实证分析[J].统计研究,2023,40(1):106-120.

[28]BARUNíK J,KREHLíK T.Measuring the frequency dynamics of financial connectedness and systemic risk[J].Journal of Financial Econometrics,2018,16(2):271-296.

[29]ANDO T,GREENWOOD-NIMMO M,SHIN Y.Quantile connectedness:modelling tail behaviour in the topology of financial networks[J].Management Science,2022,68(4):2401-2431.

[30]GABAUER D,GUPTA R.On the transmission mechanism of country-specific and international economic uncertainty spillovers:evidence from a TVP-VAR connectedness decomposition approach[J].Economics Letters,2018,171 (10):63-71.

[31]CHATZIANTONIOU I,GABAUER D,STENFORS A.Interest rate swaps and the transmission mechanism of monetary policy:a quantile connectedness approach[J].Economics Letters,2021,204:109891.

[32]WANG Y,ZHANG Z,LI X,et al.Dynamic return connectedness across global commodity futures markets:evidence from time and frequency domains[J].Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and its Applications,2020,542:123464.

[33]SCOTT J P.Social network analysis:a handbook[M].London:Sage Publication,2017.

[34]GHOSH M.Agricultural policy reforms and spatial integration of food grain markets in India[J].Journal of Economics and Development,2011,36:15-37.

(1)受篇幅限制,具体方法在此不再赘述。

基本信息:

DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2024.11.001

中图分类号:F313.7;F713.35

引用信息:

[1]丁存振,王赞.大变局下中美农产品期货市场间溢出效应研究——基于频域和分位数溢出的视角[J].世界农业,2024,No.547(11):5-18.DOI:10.13856/j.cn11-1097/s.2024.11.001.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金面上项目“重大突发事件冲击下我国粮食全球供应链风险防范研究”(24BGL174); 全国统计科学研究重点项目“国际粮食供应链安全风险测度与防范研究”(2022LZ02); 山东省重点研发计划(软科学)重大项目“山东省粮食产业链供应链韧性和安全水平提升研究”(2023RZA02014)

发布时间:

2024-09-27

出版时间:

2024-09-27

网络发布时间:

2024-09-27

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文